Theology of Type (2): Gutenberg to Early 1900s

Carl Shank • November 1, 2025

Theology of Type (2): Gutenberg to Early 1900s

William Skeen in his 1872 Early Typography celebrated what he called “The Art Sublime” referring to typography and its use for divine illumination —

I seek, Disciple of the Art;

That to the famed Teutonic three

Just meeds of praise may given be;

That all aright the men may know

To whom Typography we owe;

The men whose names immortal ring,

Whose gifts transcendent blessings bring,

Whose monuments in every land

By wisdom rear’d, heart-honor’d stand,

Inscribed in tongues of every clime —

“Inventors of the Art Sublime!”[1]

 

Skeen pontificates that “to this Art, as it was invented and perfected in Europe in the Fifteenth century, the epithets Divine and Noble have not untruly been applied.”[2] "It is Divine, inasmuch as it is one of the grand instruments in the hands of Providence for the regeneration of fallen humanity. By it the mightiest movement the world has ever seen since the days when the Apostolic Twelve went about “turning it upside down,” — the Great Reformation of the Sixteenth century, — was mainly effected. Without it the Word of God could not have been diffused, as it has been, is being, and will continue to be, to every nation and tribe and people and tongue throughout the world.”[3]


We are made by our Creator to be “sensory-rich,” and our typographic history unfolds this in stunning and diverse ways. As one writer has so eloquently said "Holy Scripture calls us to inhabit an ordered world of creation and providence that is sensory rich, but we suffer what we may regard as spiritual sensory deprivation. And the more we discover the depth, scope and lush richness of the divinely ordered real world, the more we discover the impoverishment of the modern condition."[4]


Even the briefest of surveys and historical typographic study will reveal the theology of type. The depth, scope and richness of typography through the centuries displays either the beauty God has given this world, or the resistance to such beauty.


The Protestant Reformation of the sixteenth century was deeply tied to advancements in typography and printing, which played a crucial role in spreading reformist ideas. Some major typographical advances during this period include the use of the printing press of Johann Gutenberg around 1440 which had revolutionized printing. Printers improved the efficiency of moveable type, making it faster and easier to print large numbers of religious pamphlets, tracts and Bibles. 


Instead of obscure Latin, reformers like Martin Luther advocated for scripture and religious texts in local, common languages. The Blackletter face Fraktur was a Gothic script used in German-speaking areas. The more humanist Roman type gained traditional use in parts of Europe.


Woodcut illustrations like those of Lucas Cranach the Elder, who supported Martin Luther, complemented printed texts, making complex religious ideas and theological concepts more accessible to a largely illiterate population. There were greater efforts in standardizing spelling and grammar studies and books. Printing advancements enabled the production of smaller, more affordable Bibles.


These typographical innovations, combined with the theological upheaval of the Reformation, transformed the way people accessed and engaged with religious texts, ultimately shaping modern literacy and communication.

GUTENBERG ERA TYPOGRAPHY (1450 +)

Scribes in pre-Gutenberg times labored for years creating wonderful typographic art, such as in the Landsifarne Gospels. Typography in Gutenberg’s pre-Victorian days spoke of craftsmanship, classical ideals and typographic innovation. From Printers Marks, as we saw in Part 1 of this study, to blackletter fonts to humanist typefaces, typography became more refined, rational, and mathematically structured.


The term “University” in relation to blackletter fonts typically refers to the use of these fonts in academic and religious contexts during the Middle Ages, and later in formal academic environments where tradition, authority, and history are emphasized. The most notable “University” blackletter fonts are linked to the old European universities and have been used in documents, manuscripts, and crests. Three traditionally common faces were Textura, Fraktur and Rotunda.


Blackletter type is gratuitous in that it makes the Triune God available to the masses of the times. Instead of God’s revelation locked up in monasteries and for only the favored few, everyone could now read the Bible in their own language, not merely ancient Latin.


Blackletter objectifies God in the sense that we have written revelation, not obscure mystical teachings. Blackletter, however, fails at typological differences, making it hard to read and decipher at times for moderns. Blackletter was desirable in the period in which it was used. Blackletter type certainly crossed geographical and language backgrounds in Europe and England and beyond. It was a boundary-crossing typeface. Lastly, blackletter was “fitting” for the times. It would be, of course, succeeded by more legible and elegant typefaces.


One of the most beautiful italic typefaces is Baskerville. Designed in 1757 by John Baskerville in Birmingham, England, Baskerville Italic demonstrates the outstanding qualities of harmony, precision and readability. “At a time when books in England were generally printed to a low standard, using typefaces of conservative design, Baskerville sought to offer books created to higher-quality methods of printing than any before, using carefully made, level presses, a high quality of ink and very smooth paper pressed after printing to a glazed, gleaming finish.”[5]


Along with Blackletter and roman type, italics has served as one of the major typefaces in the history of Western typography. Italic takes notable influences from hand drawn calligraphy, with italic letters normally slanted slightly to the right. Upper case letters may have typographic swashes, flourishes inspired by ornate calligraphy. The name “italic” comes from their Italian use, to replace documents traditionally written in a hand-written style called chancery hand. Italic typefaces are defined by their slanted, cursive-like appearance, with letters that have a flowing, dynamic quality. It allowed for more text to be fitted on the page and mimicked the handwriting style of humanist scholars, like the handwriting of Petrarch.


Italic typefaces were originally used separate from the roman face. In fact, Aldus Manutius wedded the italic face with small roman capitals in his Virgil of 1501.  Aldus was the first to suggest the printing of a polyglot Bible, a Bible with multiple versions. However, the first polyglot work ever printed was a Psalter, the literary work of Augustin Justinian, a Corsican bishop, of eight columns, each a different translation in Genoa, Italy in 1516. 


VICTORIAN BEAUTY (1837–1901)

The heavy ornamentation of the Victorian period gave us decorative and fancy type, with a trend toward expressiveness over readability in display typography. Printers would mix multiple typefaces on a single page or poster to catch the eye. The Industrial Revolution facilitated the mass production of such printing. Type was used to create hierarchy and drama with little concern for typographic minimalism.


Type styles that emerged in the Victorian period included Egyptian slab serif, like this Alfa Slab One font and Rockwell.


Would we consider Victorian type beautiful? The lack of white space and forced, bold, and audacious design ideas and posters might challenge the quality of proportion, unity, variety, symmetry, harmony, intricacy, delicacy, simplicity and suggestiveness — the description of “fittingness.” Its desirability had limited appeal historically. Yet, this era above all was strongly rooted in the objective in its demands to be noticed and speaking loudly to us of the rule of God in life and thought. It was “really there” boldly and powerfully there. So, in many senses, for at least a period of time, Victorian type was theologically beautiful and eventful.


ART NOUVEAU (1890–1910)

Art Nouveau typography was more art than rigid form with curvilinear, elegant, and stylized lettering forms, sometimes with asymmetrical or unconventional shapes. Typefaces mimicked natural shapes, like vines, tendrils and flowers, as in the P22 Art Nouveau Extras glyphs featured.


Typography wasn’t just functional but rather integrated into the overall artistic composition of posters, magazines and books. Much of the art and even typefaces were hand-drawn, borrowing from calligraphy and even medieval scripts, adding a romantic quality to the resulting art.


Art Nouveau was a reaction against the academicism, eclecticism and historicism of nineteenth century architecture and decorative art. The new art movement had its roots in Britain, in the floral designs of William Morris, and in the Arts and Crafts movement founded by the pupils of Morris. The Grasset Typeface from Lewis F. Day’s Alphabets Old and New, London, 1910, shows that art nouveau flair for which these men were famous. The font has been digitized by CARE Typography.


Famous examples include the works of Alphonse Mucha (1860–1939), a Czech painter, illustrator and graphic artist. He was known for his decorative theatrical posters, especially those of Sarah Bernhardt, a French stage actress of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Wikipedia notes that he became devoutly religious — “For me, the notions of painting, going to church, and music are so closely knit that often I cannot decide whether I like church for its music, or music for its place in the mystery which it accompanies.”[6] At the Paris Universal Exposition of 1900 he depicted a future society in the Balkans where Catholic and Orthodox Christians and Muslims lived in harmony together. Mucha was a devoted Catholic mystic — “I had not found any real satisfaction in my old kind of work. I saw that my way was to be found elsewhere, little bit higher. I sought a way to spread the light which reached further into even the darkest corners. I didn’t have to look for very long. The Pater Noster (Lord’s Prayer): why not give the words a pictorial expression?[7]


Is Art Nouveau theologically beautiful? I start with the subjective opening quote from Nigel French and Hugh D’Andrade in The Type Project Book: Typographic Projects To Sharpen Your Creative Skills & Diversify Your Portfolio (Pearson Education, 2021) that you either love it or hate it. And many people love the organic, flowing flowers and stems and fancy type that adorns Art Nouveau posters and advertisements. However, looking more deeply at our starting description of God honoring beauty, we can make several observations. 


A few of the Art Nouveau designers did attempt to bring glory to God and reflect his creation as a gift. Others not so much, especially Behrens. Art Nouveau certainly illustrated the principle of harmony or unity of expression as well as diversity. Art Nouveau crossed geographical and social boundaries well. Some of it was “fitting” in terms of beauty and objectifiably outstanding, like the Behrens designs. Art Nouveau served as a graphical and artistic bridge to later graphic arts.


Cut with the Kitchen Knife Dada through the Beer Belly of the Weimar Republic,

Hannah Höch, 1919


Hugo Ball’s famous Karawane (1916), composed of invented words, emphasized performance and phonetics over readability —


Karawane

jolifanto bambla o falli bambla

großiga m’pfa habla horem

egiga goramen

higo bloiko russula huju

hollaka hollala

anlogo bung

blago bung blago bung

bosso fataka

ü üü ü

schampa wulla wussa olobo

hej tatta gorem

eschige zunbada

wulubu ssubudu uluwu ssubudu

tumba ba-umf

kusa gauma

ba - umf


DADAISM (1916-1918)

The avant-garde movement of Dadaism used type to express anti-establishment sentiment. This avant-garde movement rejected order and logic, which it regarded as having failed to prevent the catastrophic First World War. This frightfully horrific war trashed former utopian dreams of a wonderful, orderly and helpful society. Dada was nihilistic and used dynamic, non-linear text to express anger and emotion. The term “Dada” has no actual meaning. It is a childlike word used to describe lack of reason or logic in artwork and typography.


Dada undermined  the rules and distinctions between reading and viewing. Meaning was derived from form, not syntax. Dada artists used type in manifestos that were typographically explosive and politically provocative. Logic and coherence were readily attacked. Type danced, shouted and clashed. Type disrupted, questioned and awakened. Dada’s typographic innovations laid the groundwork for later movements like Surrealism, Situationism, Fluxus and Punk graphic design.


A leading Dada magazine of the period, Die Aktion (“The Action”), emphasized literary Expressionism and was published between 1911 and 1932 in Berlin. It stood for socialistic left-wing politics.


Later Situationists resistance to society is called in the French détournement, the tactic of taking something that exists and changing it to give a different message to that which was originally intended. Dada typography and adherents were Situationists in typography.


In the Dadaists rejection of order and logic in typography, using as many different fonts they wanted, and liberating typography from the grid of letter press, printing horizontally, vertically and diagonally on the same page, their rejectionist typography inspired the visual arts, literature, and theater. That influence is still being felt today.


Difference and distance typographically in Dadaism could under God be made to reflect the unity and diversity of God. God providentially has used Dadaist typography to challenge, to awaken, to express the disorder in this sin-fallen world. Typography was no longer passive, but performative, disruptive and deeply expressive. Type can speak, in other words, in ways that grab our attention about the disorder of this world and even point us to the God who rules over such disorder.


Perhaps Dadaism’s ultimate function was to force us away from our neatly contrived autonomy and consider what makes us who we are. Type and typography would never be the same after Dadaism. In modern graphic design, especially Swiss typography, echoes of Dada’s experimentation live on, though often more refined. This type-based rebellion lasts!


SOURCES

(Note that much of this info from the author’s Typographical Beauty Through the Ages: A Christian Perspective, Lulu Press, 2025)

1.   William Skeen, Early Typography (Colombo: Ceylon, 1872), opening poem.

2.   Skeen, 11–12.

3.   Skeen, 12–13.)

4.   Mark A. Garcia, “The World of the Word of God,” Westminster Magazine (Vol. 2, Issue 2, Spring 2025), 11.

5.   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baskerville

6.   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphonse_Mucha.

7.   Ibid.




Successful Layout & Design

By Carl Shank February 12, 2026
Free Fonts: A Deal or Trouble? The latest Google estimate of available fonts is over 300,000 and counting. Other estimates have catalogued over 550,000 fonts. There are over 36,000 font families, over 4,000 type designers and over 2,700 professional font foundries, not counting smaller font entrepreneurs like CARE Typography, which provides restored fonts from yesteryear. (Quora source https://www.quora.com/How-many-fonts-are-there-in-existence-Does-any-group-attempt-to-keep-a-record-of-all-the-fonts-that-exist ) There are commercial fonts from sources like Adobe and MyFonts (Monotype) which require payment for their use in various platforms. Both provide a subscription service, which usually requires a substantial monthly or yearly fee to download and use their fonts. When I began using Apple Macintoshes in the 1980s, font manufacturers like Adobe and Monotype would “sell” the right to use a number of their fonts for thousands of dollars. And, by the way, you never really “own” the font. You have paid only for the use of the font for a specific purpose or machine. Moreover, the price varies for print use, or web use, or a digital ad use. Even today, the font Trinité Titling by Bram de Does, used in a number of Bibles and biblical studies, costs over $4,000 for the use on a single computer and much more for a number of computer users. Individual users of such fonts are mostly priced out of their budget. Why the seemingly extravagant cost? We had a valve on one of our household plumbing lines go bad. I called the plumber, and he replaced the valve — at a cost of several hundred dollars, while the valve itself cost only a few dollars. Was that fair? Yes, because I was paying for the time and training and effort going into replacing that valve in my house. The same holds true for professional font designers. They spend hundreds, sometimes thousands, of hours in font development. We are paying for their livelihood. Font licenses cover four basic parameters around font usage — “The What: The weight and style of the typeface; The Where: Literally where you’ll use the font – a website, digital ad, or in print; The Who: The number times a font can be installed on a computer (aka the number of people who can use it); The How many: For example, web font licenses describe the number of allotted page views, and app and digital marketing licenses set similar parameters.” (Monotype Report) Companies like Monotype are rarely concerning with an individual using a font for a home, individualized project, but rather an entire design company or printer using that font for commercial gain and advertising dollars. There are fonts available “for personal use only,” prohibiting their use for commercial or money-making projects. There are what have been called “shareware” fonts, fonts with a minimal cost which require attribution of the type designer or provider on projects. Most fonts provide a EULA, or font license, which outlines and determines the legal restrictions and ramifications for their use. What about free fonts? Monotype warns against using unlicensed or what are called “free” fonts for several valid reasons, but, in my opinion, this is an obvious ploy to get the user to buy or subscribe to their font services. One Monotype report cites six issues associated with what are deemed “free” fonts. Free fonts may pop up in similar ads or designs to industry competition, perhaps prompting a lawsuit or cease-and-desist actions. Free fonts often have the inability to scale, add special characters, or even different alphabets. Free fonts have limited creative scope. They may be saddled with malware or software viruses. Poor font design can be a problem with such fonts. A sixth problem with so-called free fonts is that they can be actually “pirated” fonts, copied from legitimately designed fonts. “Aside from branding issues, free fonts also suffer from a whole host of performance issues. Fonts are software files that interact with applications and the operating system on which it’s installed; without the guidance of a skilled font engineer, rendering issues may arise from crashing glyphs, or a lack of proper kerning (the space between glyphs) text in certain scenarios. A free font downloaded from a random website might not support a broad range of languages and or complex scripts (e.g., Japanese or Arabic), or basic diatrics to cover commonly used Latin languages.” (Monotype Report) Monotype maintains that free fonts won’t give a company the individual style it deserves to help it stand out in the marketplace. They also point to the legal ramifications involved with font licensing, not a glamorous subject but one in which company attorneys are hired to examine for possible litigation. Types of Free Fonts There are four sources of free fonts — Open Source fonts with an SIL Open Font License (SEE https://openfontlicense.org ); OS fonts, fonts that come with your operating system and hardware; Subscription add-on fonts that come as an add-on to a subscription service; and, advertised free fonts by independent font designers, such as CARE Typography. Many or most of such free fonts come from freeware, shareware, public domain or demo fonts downloaded or reconstructed from an archive or library, like Internet Archive. Companies such as Website Planet offer free “commercial” fonts, fonts that can be used in business and corporate applications. See https://www.websiteplanet.com/blog/best-free-fonts/. Several cautions, however, are still in order here. First, a font that “looks like” a standard, business font is not the same thing as its “older brother.” An example is Website Planet’s Playfair Display font, both a variable and static font designed by Claus Eggers Sørensen licensed under the SIL Open Font License agreement. Yet, this font looks a lot like the standard Bodoni font, created by Giambattista Bodoni in 1767 and revived by Morris Fuller Benton in 1911 under Linotype’s commercial license.
By Carl Shank December 23, 2025
More on the Greek font. In a previous post ( It's Greek To Me! March 18, 2023) we noted that Cursive Greek type appeared as a chancery script by Francesco Griffo in 1502 and lasted two hundred years. Robert Bringhurst notes that "chancery Greeks were cut by many artists from Garamond to Cason, but Neoclassical and Romantic designers . . . all returned to simpler cursive forms . . . in the English speaking world the cursive Greek most often seen is the one designed in 1806 by Richard Porson." This face has been the "standard Greek face for the Oxford Classical Texts for over a century." ( Robert Bringhurst, The Elements of Typographic Style, Hartley & Marks, Version 3.1, 2005 , pp. 274, 278) In fact, asking Google for the best Greek face to use, it points us to Porson Greek. Porson is a beautiful Unicode Font for Greek. It's not stiff, like many of the cleaner fonts, which are usually san serif. It is bold and easy to read and seems to more closely match the orthography in newer textbooks. (Jan 8, 2004) 
Show More