Calligraphy & Typography

Carl Shank • September 29, 2025

Calligraphy & Typography. Calligraphy, the art of beautiful handwriting, has a long and rich history that spans cultures, religions, and centuries. It developed not only as a means of communication but also as a form of artistic expression, religious devotion, and cultural preservation. While typography is not calligraphy, with much of type carefully structured, straight-backed and neatly drawn and focused on lettering for printing readability, both art forms involve visual expression of language. Both focus on the shape, proportion and beauty of letters. Both reflect religious, historical and cultural influences on writing styles. Both are used for artistic and decorative purposes in design, and much of type has been greatly influenced by calligraphic styles. Yet, they differ significantly in their methods, purposes and tools.


Calligraphy is the art of hand drawn, beautiful writing, while typography focuses on the design and arrangement of type letters for print or digital use. Calligraphy is created manually with pens, brushes, or quills, while type is created digitally or mechanically using typefaces. Traditional tools used in calligraphy include dip pens, brushes and ink, while type is formed with digital or physical lettering. Calligraphy is highly expressive and free flowing, while type is usually uniform and consistent across all characters. Calligraphy is usually done for decorative and personal use, while typography is often constructed and used for mass communication in books, websites and signage. Mediums for calligraphy include paper, parchment, walls, while typography focuses on print and digital media. Yet, the roots of much of type comes from the wealth of history and styling offered by calligraphy. CARE Typography has been able with Font Lab's tools like Fontographer, to translate fine calligraphy into usable typefaces, even for the modern market tastes.


The fine art of calligraphy is highlighted in the background to this post in the 2018 calligraphic rendering of the Scripture, "Well done, good and faithful servant" (Matthew 25:25a) by Calligraphy for Christ (https://www.calligraphyforchrist.com/). Such beautiful religious typographic pieces actually begin not with the Gutenberg era in 1450 but with the ancient Chinese.

Chinese Beginnings. Long before Gutenberg in 1450, printing from moveable type was invented in China in the 1040s by the scholarly engineer Bi Sheng. Fêng Tao, who a century or more after the beginning of block printing improved the art and applied it to new uses, is usually regarded by Chinese as the inventor of printing, and holds much the same place in Chinese history that Gutenberg holds in that of Europe. From his day printing became a fine art.


Chinese calligraphy is among the oldest and most continuously practiced forms of calligraphy, from the second millennium BC. The precise origins of Chinese printing remain obscure. Religious seals had been used since long before the Han period (202 BC–220 AD), and the Chinese had later used large seals carved from hardwood to reduplicate Taoist religious charms in large numbers. Small wooden stamps similar to those employed in printing textile patterns were used for the replication of images of the Buddha. (Twitchett, 13)*


In Chinese calligraphy and typography, each character is considered to occupy a square space of equal size, the characters being arranged in vertical columns, usually separated in traditional printing by a fine line. The Chinese compositor was thus faced with none of the complexities of spacing and layout that confront the Western typographer. This "block printing" method lasted and remained standard even into modern times.


The blocks for fine printing were made from a hard close-grained wood, usually pear or jujube. The surface was prepared with a sort of size. The copy for the page to be printed was written by a copyist on a very thin paper, and this was laid face down on the surface of the block while the size was still wet. The engraver then cut the block around the characters. A page printed in this way could thus reproduce any style of calligraphy, or any mixture of styles, any size or variety of sizes of character, and could equally easily accommodate both text and illustrations. The blocks could be corrected by recutting, by inserting plugs into the block and recutting over them, and by minor trimming.(Twitchett, 70)


Chinese calligraphy developed as both a visual and spiritual art form. Writing was done with brush and ink on paper or silk. Notable calligraphers included Ouyang Xun (557–641 BC), a Tang Dynasty master of what is called "regular script." During the Tang Dynasty, he was a censor and scholar at the Hongwen Academy, where he taught calligraphy. He later became the Imperial Calligrapher and inscribed several major imperial steles.

Wang Xizhi (303–361 BC), known as the "Sage of Calligraphy," produced "On the Seventeenth Day," a selection of twenty-nine letters under the sponsorship of the Tang emperor Taizong. (Print above from Wikipedia) (www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/39899)


Yan Zhenqing (709–785) was known for his bold and dynamic style. Su Shi (1037–1101), a scholar and poet, practiced expressive cursive calligraphy. Wikipedia notes that approximately 2,700 poems and 800 letters penned by Su Shi have been preserved to date. His mastery spanned across various forms, including the shici and fu styles of poetry, as well as prose, calligraphy, and painting. While a significant portion of his poetry is in the shi format, it is his 350 ci style poems that largely cemented his poetic legacy. 


It should be noted that Chinese calligraphy involves a graphic language of a very small number of simple

stroke shapes combined into more complex glyphs. There is a particular way to make dots, horizontal lines, vertical lines, lines angled left, lines angled right, corners and endings of lines. (Judith Sutcliffe)  In fact, there are five styles of script in Chinese calligraphy, the seal script, clerical script, regular script, running script and cursive. Characters are written top to bottom, left to right, and horizontal to vertical. There are eight different types of strokes, and each has a specific way they should be drawn.


"It is an art of turning square Chinese characters into expressive images by varying the speed and pressure of a pointed Chinese brush. By controlling the concentration of ink, the thickness and adsorptivity of the paper, and the flexibility of the brush, the artist is free to produce an infinite variety of styles and forms. In contrast to western calligraphy, diffusing ink blots and dry brush strokes are viewed as a natural expression rather than a fault. While western calligraphy often pursues font-like uniformity, Chinese calligraphy emphasizes more on expressing one’s emotions." (www.chinaonlinemuseum.com/ calligraphy.php)

Japanese & Korean Calligraphy. Both Japanese and Korean calligraphy developed from Chinese roots. As in all early calligraphic forms and writings, such calligraphy was heavily influenced by Buddhism. Kukai (774–835) was a monk who brought Chinese calligraphy to Japan. His importance in Japanese Buddhism has developed stories and legends, one of them which attributes the kana syllabary to him, with which the Japanese language is written to this day. Ono no Michikaze (894–966) took a first step in Japanizing the art of calligraphy from China, with strong influence from Wang Xizhi and Wang Xianzhi.Fujiwara no Kozei (1100s) popularized calligraphic styles imported from China. He was called the master of the "way of writing." Kim Jeong-hui (1786–1856) in Korea developed the Chusa style, merging Chinese and Korean aesthetics.

Early Christian Calligraphy/Typography. Greek classical and Byzantine scripts, along with the Roman script, were important in developing western calligraphy and later typography. The development of uncial and half-uncial scripts has been covered in detail in my Typography Through the Years (Lulu Press, 2024) in the chapters on "The Alphabet" and "Pre-Gutenberg Printing." Monks in that period preserved ancient knowledge through scriptoria in monasteries, with lavishly decorated religious texts like the Book of Kells and Lindisfarne Gospels. Carolingian Minuscule was developed under Charlemagne, with uniform and legible script that influenced later Latin typefaces.


Blackletter or Gothic script was derived from medieval European calligraphy (12th–17th centuries). Typefaces that developed from such calligraphy included Fraktur, Old English Text and Gothic typefaces. These strong, angular, dense forms have been used in formal documents, diplomas and even newspaper mastheads today, like the New York Times.

Italic Script. Derived from Italian Renaissance calligraphy (15th century), scribes in Rome and Florence began using what we call italics , or slanted letters for faster writing. The Renaissance, beginning in Italy in the fourteenth century, marked a revival of classical antiquity and a move toward humanism. This brought a renewed interest in the legible, flowing scripts of Roman and Greek antiquity, which were more readable and aesthetically simple compared to Gothic lettering. The development of the printing press (ca. 1440) by Johannes Gutenberg created a need for more versatile and legible typefaces. The emerging humanist values aligned with a preference for typefaces that resembled the clear, round, and graceful writing of ancient Roman scripts.


The Italic typeface was introduced by Aldus Manutius in Venice around 1501. Manutius, a prominent printer and publisher, sought to create more compact and elegant typefaces that could fit more text on a page, catering to the rising demand for smaller, portable books. Italic was based on the handwriting of Niccolò de’ Niccoli, a Renaissance scholar and calligrapher. Italic typefaces are defined by their slanted, cursive-like appearance, with letters that have a flowing, dynamic quality. It allowed for more text to be fitted on the page and mimicked the handwriting style of humanist scholars.


Italic type was not only more elegant than the Gothic but also more efficient in terms of space. It became the preferred choice for printed texts that emphasized classical learning, philosophy, poetry, and humanist literature. Italic was initially used for entire texts but later became more common for emphasis (such as book titles, headings, or foreign phrases) alongside Roman type.


Typefaces developed from this italics period include Zapfino, Palatino Italic, Adobe Jenson Italic.


Roman Capitals/Humanist Script. Ancient Roman inscriptions and Renaissance humanist writing inspired calligraphy that later translated to typefaces such as Trajan, Garamond and Bembo. Roman square capitals seen on monuments, like Trajan's Column, started to appear in book titles as well as classical or academic branding.

Copperplate Script. Derived from English Roundhand calligraphy in the 18th century, copperplate script was created with a pointed pen and pressure sensitive strokes and widely used in formal writing. Such script is often found in wedding invitations, certificates and branding for luxury items. Typefaces emerging from such script include Bickham Script, Edwardian Script and Snell Roundhand.

Brush Script. Brush Script calligraphy derives from modern brush calligraphy. Popular in the mid-twentieth century America for retro posters, signage and casual branding, its typefaces include Brush Script MT, Pacifico and Freestyle Script.

A concluding note. It is significant that early calligraphy along with typography had strong religious roots, whether that be Christian European roots or Chinese Buddhist roots or Islamic Koran rootings. Many of these calligraphers, along with their typography counterparts, believed and lived from a worldview filled with the Divine. While modern calligraphy has perhaps deviated from these religious roots, there are still calligraphers and typographers that operate out of a viewpoint of creativity that goes back to their faith in God. That is certainly true of this typographer!

Successful Layout & Design

By Carl Shank April 6, 2026
Responding to AI and Digital Babylon H. Carl Shank April 4, 2026 Austin Gravley, a former Social Media Manager of The Gospel Coalition, and now the Director of Youth Ministry at Redeemer Christian Church in Amarillo, TX, is writing a book on AI and the digital revolution taking place. He compares this Digital Babylon and its captivity and its exiles to Christians living under the overwhelming influence of an active anti-Christian developing AI. Piecing together his comments with those of many others on the advancing scene of AI on our lives, several themes come to mind. First, AI is not God. While there are some in the Silicon Valley who might wish or see AI as a unifying, ontological force that can shape or rule our lives — the Super Machine —others remind us that this is only technology. And as advanced as AI is and becomes, God is still sovereignly in control of it and our lives. Jason Thacker, professor of philosophy and ethics at Southern Seminary and Boyce College, writes — “We must engage these issues, rather than respond after their effects are widely felt. But we don’t have to face today or tomorrow with fear. God is sovereign and his Word is sufficient for every good work, so we are able to walk with confidence as we apply his Word to these challenges with wisdom and guided by his Spirit.” ( The Age of AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity , Zondervan, 2020) A recent storm that darkened my community and scuttled Internet services reminded me of that. Even AI data centers, growing to over 3,000 in 2025 nationwide, are not immune to power disruptions and total blackouts. AI pundits may claim to have control procedures to keep the Internet and AI running cannot promise it to be so. We need to keep this in mind in the Digital Babylon age, as was needed to be kept in mind by Israel in the Babylonian Empire age in biblical times. Babylon went through many iterations, but will be defeated by God at the end of the day, as noted in Revelation. Digital Babylon will experience the same demise. This is not prediction, just Bible truth. We as believers need to hold on to such truth. Second, AI is still technology. Indeed, advanced and advancing technology, but not human. Matthew Schultz in a recent mereorthodoxy.com article notes— “Technology has existed since the Garden and is an integral component of our cultural mandate. We should also remember that one of the core distinctions between the Creator and his creatures is that we never create matter but merely (!) rearrange it. This becomes clear whether we consider an ancient farmer in Mesopotamia irrigating a plot of soil, a medieval peasant in Northumbria weaving a basket from flax, or a young musician in London taking the raw outputs of machine sound, adjusting its pitch, volume, and length, and incorporating it into a DAW loop. While there are all sorts of important distinctions and qualifications between pre- and post-industrial craft, there is no metaphysical distance between the two.” ( Artificial Intelligence Is A Technology , Feb. 26, 2026). AI may be the harbinger of a new Industrial Age, but though changes will be major and sometimes severe, the human side of the equation cannot be discounted or counted out. Part of my retired status as a pastor and theologian is that of a typographer restoring old type faces and doing a deep dive into the history of type. Two historical typographical truths stand out. Although the Renaissance age brought movable type from Gutenberg and others into the machine age, the typographical flair of those ancient scribes with pen-drawn exquisite type remained a stylistic standard. The second note is that with the Industrial Age, while affecting the quantity and speed of type development and printing, master type craftsmen rebelled against machine driven type for more organic typefaces. This was seen, for instance, in the type movement spawned by William Morris (1834–1896). William Morris was an Arts & Crafts designer who founded the Kelmscott Press (1891), reviving hand craftsmanship in printing. His work influenced the twentieth century private press and type revival movements. Lettering became a vehicle for breaking convention. Led by figures such as Morris, there was a decided reaction against industrialization, seeing machine-made goods as dehumanizing and ugly. Handcraftmanship, honesty in materials and utility fused with beauty made up much of what was called the Arts & Crafts Movement. That movement was rooted in medieval guild ideals and morality in design. (For an expanded history of type development, see “Advances in Typography: A Historical Sketch — Three Parts” in the blogs by CARE Typography, www.caretypography.com , Nov. 8, 2025, Nov. 18, 2025 and Nov. 20, 2025) Third, AI affects everyone everywhere. Austin Gravely, a former Social Media Manager of The Gospel Coalition, raises and answers the query — “’So what?’, you may think. ‘I’m not an Internet technician. I’m not a fan of AI. I’m not planning to change how I use the Internet. Why does any of this matter to me?’ To put it bluntly: you are naive if you think these disruptions won’t directly affect you, or indirectly affect you through the effect they will have on others. If the iPhone, social media, and AI have taught us anything, it is that you are impacted by these events regardless of whether you participate in them or not.” ( The State of the Internet: 2026 , mereorthodoxy.com, March 30, 2026) He goes on to say — “A changing Internet will change you. It will change you in ways you can see and in ways you can’t. It will change those you live with, work with, play with, build with, and fight with. It will change what is possible, probable, permissible, and prohibited in your life, your vocation, your church, your neighborhood, and any other physical space the Internet touches.” I recall my 99 year old mother who passed away a couple of years ago in a nursing facility. She was one of those survivors of the Great Depression and World War Two who dismissed the first moon landing and had her flat screen TV removed from her room for fear the government was watching. She lasted for nine years in the same private room in a modern nursing center. She was attended by doctors and nurses and staff who used AI on their computers and other care devices. She even had a modern digital phone removed from her room and refused to learn it. While she personally rebelled against her AI driven machine age, she could not escape those who used such technology for her care. We cannot isolate ourselves from AI and its advancing development, no matter how isolated we try to be. Fourth, AI can be either a blessing or a curse. Again, Matthew Schultz notes — “Our task is not to develop a unique theology of AI but to catechize our members into a people who can wield this technology without becoming captive to its internal logic. Like alcohol, artificial intelligence will become a test of character, a dangerous good that divides the foolish from the wise.” He says “Yet the greatest danger is both more pervasive and less obvious: AI is much more likely to be deployed as a multiplicative layer that allows ever more efficient micro-targeting of digital services and physical products by industries that already profit from compulsive behavior. The advent of hyper-personalized, real-time engagement strategies will require legislative safeguards, especially if AI leads to video advertisements generated in real time for an exhaustively mapped individual profile.” We must seek to “humanize” AI and employ it “humanly.” We must resist the phenomenological bent toward unbelief in AI development and pressures. We must once again learn to think critically and pervasively and biblically about AI. Our young people must be taught prescriptive critical thinking practices, rather than unwittingly and ignorantly giving in to what their phones and computers spit out. Church and ministry pastors must pastor rather than let AI bots plan, prepare and even give their sermons. We must learn to smartly negotiate with the “Magnificent Seven”— Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Nvidia and Tesla — rather than blindly following their lead. Convenience and speed must not be allowed to overtake and overcome careful, sustained and critical thinking and acting. “To give language to this change, we must take the best of Christian thinking regarding the social and political imaginary and apply it to the economic imaginary of life under the glowing shores of Digital Babylon, and that kind of work cannot be done with quick hot takes. It will take slow, deep, and thoughtful meditation to apply the riches of Christian thought to making sense of the companies that got us here and where they are taking us.” (Austin Gravley, The State of The Internet: 2026 ) I am both excited and wary of AI. I have learned to be much more cautious about social media and the videos and photos and information they give. Much of it has been and is being AI produced and tweaked. Spammers use AI technology to wrest thousands of dollars from unsuspecting senior citizens. Schools are requiring students to turn off their cell phones or “bag” them until after school hours because of the insidious nature of AI generated stuff. I value more and more of a face-to-face approach in teaching and learning and mentoring others. And we must adopt a state of “believing is seeing” rather than a non-Christian scientifically sanctioned “seeing is believing” approach to truth and justice.
By Carl Shank March 31, 2026
Type Details Matter: Typos & Fractions Carl Shank March 31, 2026 “The practice of typography, if it be followed faithfully, is hard work — full of detail, full of petty restrictions, full of drudgery, and not greatly rewarded as men now count rewards. There are times when we need to bring to it all the history and art and feeling that we can, to make it bearable. But in the light of history, and of art, and of knowledge and of man’s achievement, it is as interesting a work that exists—a broad and humanizing employment which indeed can be followed merely as a trade, but which if perfected into an art or even broadened into a profession, will perpetually open new horizons to our eyes and new opportunities to our hands.” (“Thoughts Upon A Typographic Custom,” Alexander S. Lawson, Electronic Publishing , January 28, 1994) Such detail and “petty restrictions” are to be found in the consideration and history of typographic errors (typos) and the use of fractions. In my March 23, 2023 blog I noted that we need more than a spellchecker. Spell checkers are great. They help us in busy offices doing busy tasks everyday. EXCEPT they cannot correct errors of statement or errors of typography. Grant Weisbrot of New York City has noted that "it is impossible to efficiently proofread without a knowledge of typesetting and printing procedures." ("The Typographic Eye: Proofreading," Electronic Publishing , May 13, 1994) Thus, the note to “raise the register mark and close up the space” in an article is translated by the typographer to “kern the register mark five units and raise it 1¼ points.”  He gives some examples of errors of statements — spelling when letters are missing, like "he" for "the;" spelling in a piece published in Britain, like "color" for "colour;" using a correctly spelled word in a wrong way, like 20 carat gold (carat is a diamond weight, karat is an alloy of gold, caret is an insertion mark, and carrot is a vegetable); awkward sentence structure, incorrect or inconsistent capitalization, ungrammatical or awkward sentence structure, failure to apply indents or hangs when suitable, and errors of fact, like the kangaroos of Tibet.
Show More