About Sans Serif Fonts

Carl Shank • July 17, 2024

About Sans Serif Fonts.  Whether we realize it or not, our alphabet began as sans serif characters. “Sans-serif” is a French term meaning “without feet.” Most type you read is what is called “serif” text, or text with feet. The “feet” are the little stems at the end of characters that make up a large part of textual materials. They make the reading legible, easy to digest, and allow the least eye strain for longer reading periods.


Sans Serif fonts can be seen on Sumerian Clay tablets (3000–2076 BC) and later on Greek stone tablets and headstones. “The first sans serif Roman letters were gold jewelry engravings that date from 700 BC, when the city of Rome was nothing but straw and mud huts.” (Steve Kennedy, “Facts-o-Type,” Typeworld, September 15, 1991) 


Nicolette Gray in A History of Lettering (David Godine Publishers, 1986 and in the U.K. by Phaidon Press Limited) says that “the idea does not seem to have been pursued until the end of the eighteenth century, when it was taken up as part of the revival of Greek architecture . . . in the next century it was used in a very different context and as a different conception.” (173) By the turn of the century, a whole collection of sans serif types, called “grotesques had been generally accepted for use in advertising and promotional printing.” (Kennedy) In Victorian England, sans serif faces were used as an architectural lettering, on pubs and shops. Bringhurst points out that the first unserifed (sans serif) type was cut by William Caslon in London, in 1816, consisting of capitals only. Such faces were first cut in Germany in the 1830s. 


Block capitals in typography refer to uppercase letters that are often used in a clear, straightforward style. They're typically characterized by their uniform height and consistent stroke width, which makes them highly legible. This style is often used for headings, titles, and signs where readability is crucial.

In more technical terms, block capitals might be contrasted with other letter forms like italics or script fonts, which have more variation in stroke width and slant. Block capitals are often used in contexts where a clean, no-nonsense appearance is desired, such as in legal documents, certain types of signage, or any place where clarity is paramount. Note the example below by W.A. Pearce, a prominent figure in the printing industry, especially noted for his contributions during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Although not as widely recognized today, his work was significant in the development and advancement of printing technologies and practices of his time.


These typefaces were generally disdained by book publishers and looked upon as beneath the types used for printing. Most of these faces were dark, coarse and tightly closed and illegible in smaller point sizes. Original Helvetica and Franklin Gothic are instances, “cultural souvenirs of the bleakest days of the Industrial Revolution.” (Bringhurst, The Elements of Typographic Style, 188–189) Sans serif fonts were seen only as “utility” fonts — “The introduction of some modification of line width is almost always required to give it any subtlety of design. We have seen that some experiments were made in the fifteenth century . . . but the idea does not seem to have been pursued until this century [twentieth], when it has been used in type designs such as Optima.” (Gray, 173)


The Bauhaus School for Architecture and the Applied Arts was opened in 1919 by Walter Gropius and emphasized the primary role of function in design, thus excluding the serifs. A number of typographers allied themselves with the Bauhaus school, and the resulting controversy between serifs and sans serifs simply amplified type design.


The typeface, Erbar, designed by Josef Erbar in 1913, was the first of the new German gothic types to disturb conservative printing traditionalists — “Erbar along with Koch’s Kabel and Renner’s Futura became the model for the European and American typefounders flood of sans serifs which were to follow.” (Kennedy) Note the Erbar font on the right. It is a well-proportioned font, with the capital M straight sided with a middle V. Caps E, F, L, T are narrow. The ascender of the lower case t is angled, providing an impetus for other sans serif gothics that followed to do the same.


A black and white font with the alphabet and numbers on a white background.
It is a font that is also in medium and demi.

Kabel was designed by Rudolf Koch (1927–30) in Offenbach, Germany. The lighter weights have a small x-height, with the eye in the original black weight too large. The International Typeface Corporation (ITC) redesigned Kabel in the 1980s to make the font more uniform throughout, functioning better at smaller sizes and with text. The font was named to commemorate the first transatlantic telegraph cable.  Note the splayed M with a sharp apex, the lower case g with an open bowl and the ear extending to the right. Ascenders are tall and terminals are cut at an angle. The ampersand is sized to fit the intermediate figure height. Kabel became a popular geometric sans serif face. It served as an inspiration for many more sans serifs that followed. Indeed, the study of the light strokes of archaic Greek inscriptions, with their large aperture, geometric typographic meditation on the circle and the line, and the study of Renaissance calligraphy and humanistic form helped propel sans serifs to greater subtlety and usability.


Futura, designed by Paul Renner in 1924–26 in Frankfurt, is a geometric sans serif font. The stroke is carefully shaped to give it optical balance. Futura’s popularity was unprecedented. Monotype even released alternate characters to make Gill Sans more Futura-like — “The European cloning of Futura was joined when a French typefounder released an electroplated copy of Futura, which they named Europe.” (Kennedy) Note the capital M is splayed and the mid strokes extend to the baseline. The tail of the Q is straight. The lower case a is one-storied; the tail of the g is open, and the lower case u has the same design as its capital.


Futura typeface is also in medium italic also in bold also in condensed medium & extra bold.
Futura sample on the authority of falconer madan
A picture of a font called gill sans typeface
A page of text that says gill sans sample on the top

Gill Sans, designed by Eric Gill, was the British answer to the large amount of sans serifs inspired by Renner’s Futura. “Gill based his type on Edward Johnson’s sans serif which was designed as signage for the London Underground in 1916.” (Kennedy) The Gill Sans font is more readable and legible of all modern sans serif fonts. Kennedy says that “a close inspection of Gill Sans reveals that its legibility comes from its austerity, and Gill’s experience as a stone cutter.” Note that the inside white space in the capital G gives this character its form. The aperture is large. The lower case g’s ear protrudes horizontally. The cap M is straight sided, with a short V’d and based on classic roman letterforms. Books have been set with Gill Sans.


Spartan is Mergenthaler Linotype’s unlicensed version of Futura, copied weight by weight from Bauer. It was produced in 1939 when the sans serif typeface Metro failed to gain a significant share of the market, and was later adopted by American Type Foundries (ATF). The small sizes of Book and Heavy cut for classified are original. American type foundries wanted sans serif typefaces to compete with popular European faces that were being imported to this country. To say that Spartan is similar to Renner’s Futura is understating the case. Copying of fonts by competitors happened all the time.


Spartan typeface is also in medium also in bold also in light , extra light , thin , semibold , extra bold , black.
A spartan sample from the authority of falconer madan
The fruitiger typeface is also in bold.
On the authority of falconer madan , major general gibbes rigaud , in 1887

Frutiger, designed by Adrian Frutiger in 1975 and issued by Mergenthaler, gave airport visitors clear signage at the Charles DeGalle Airport in France. It works well with his text typeface, Méridien. Note its balance and openness — Frutiger decided instead to make a new sans serif typeface that would be suitable for the specific legibility requirements of airport signage: easy recognition from the distances and angles of driving and walking. The resulting font was in accord with the modern architecture of the airport.  In 1976, he expanded and completed the family for D. Stempel AG in conjunction with Linotype.” (myfonts.com)


Formata, designed by Bernd Mollenstadt and issued by Berthold in 1984, presents a very readable and pleasing font. I like this font very much, with its subtle and asymmetrical taper — “Instead of linear severity common to many sans serifs, Formata offers curved strokes and interesting details that are subtle in smaller sizes but distinguishable in larger sizes, thus, appropriate for both text and display. The family has an extensive weight range complimented by small caps, old style figures, fractions and the Euro symbol for both the normal and condensed versions.” (myfonts.com)


A font with the alphabet and numbers in it
On the authority of falconer madan , major general gibbes rigaud , in 1887
Franklin gothic typeface is also in bold italic and thin , extra light , light , medium and others.
Franklin gothic sample on the authority of falconer madan , major

Franklin Gothic is a nineteenth century font, a “quintessential American sans for more than a century. Designed by Morris Fuller Benton and released in 1905 by American Type Founders, Franklin Gothic quickly stood out in the crowded field of sans-serif types, gaining an enduring popularity. Benton’s original design was a display face in a single weight. It had a bold, direct solidity, yet conveyed plenty of character. A modern typeface in the tradition of 19th-century grotesques, Franklin Gothic was drawn with a distinctive contrast in stroke weight, giving it a unique personality among the more mono-linear appearance of later geometric and neo-grotesque sans-serif types.” (myfonts.com) 


Meta Pro, designed by Erik Spiekermann and issued by FontShop in1991, gives us compact and erect forms, with the “stroke subtly modulated, and the ends of the stems slightly bent and cropped at an angle, giving a faint reminiscence of serifs.” (Bringhurst, 191) The family’s weights range from Light to Black in Compressed, Condensed, and Normal and is ideally suited for book text, editorial and publishing as well as poster and billboards. (myfonts.com) Note the sample text below and its readability.


A picture of the alphabet and numbers in a meta pro typeface.
A meta pro sample of a text from the oxford press
The optima typeface is also in bold , bold italic , and extra black.
On the authority of falconer madan , major general gibbes rigaud , in 1887

Optima, designed by Hermann Zapf in 1952–55 and issued by both Stempel and Linotype, is a true sans serif font with Neoclassical influences — “Although Optima is almost always grouped with sans serif typefaces, it should be considered a serifless roman. True to its Roman heritage, Optima has wide, full-bodied characters – especially in the capitals. Only the E, F and L deviate with narrow forms. Consistent with other Zapf designs, the cap S in Optima appears slightly top-heavy with a slight tilt to the right. The M is splayed, and the N, like a serif design, has light vertical strokes. The lowercase a and g in Optima are high-legibility two-storied designs.” There is a matching Greek text font that was issued in 1971.


Shannon was designed by Kris Holmes and Janice Prescott Fishman and presented by Compugraphic in 1981. In typographer’s terms, Shannon has a humanist axis and large aperture. It draws its shapes from the letterforms in the Book of Kells (See Below), a handwritten Irish text which dates back to the 8th century.


A page of a book with a lot of writing on it
Shannon typeface also shannon oblique also shannon bold & extra bold
Shannon bold sample on the authority of falconer madan
A picture of a font called stone sans typeface.
A sample of a stone sans font is shown.

Stone Sans, designed by Sumner Stone and issued by Adobe in 1987 and by ITC in 1989, is a “sans serif of variable axis, large aperture, large x-height and subtle modulation of the stroke.” (Bringhurst, 192) It is part of a wide ranging family of typefaces, including serifed, unserifed, informal and phonetic faces, giving it expensive typographic and printing capabilities. Stone worked together with Bob Ishi (“Ishi” in Japanese means “stone”) of Adobe to create the Stone family fonts. Stone sans is very legible and can be used widely.


Syntax, a Linotype font, was “developed by Hans Eduard Meier in 1968 and presented by the font foundry D. Stempel AG. Its figures are based on Old Face characters but have a distinctive, modern design.” (myfonts.com)  It is a true neohumanist sans serif, giving us Renaissance forms. The 11 degree sloping of the italic and the half degree slope of the roman face lends the font a dynamic feel. Bringhurst notes that “an extended Syntax character set, intended specifically for setting Native American languages, was designed in 1981 by Charles Bigelow and Kris Holmes.” (192)


It is a syntax typeface that is also bold , black and ultra black.
On the authority of falconer madan , major general gibbes rigaud , in 1887 , experimented to a

This brief survey of sans serif faces allows us to trace their history while appreciating their usability in various forms of print. A number of these faces can be used in textual matter, even long texts, without losing readability or legibility. Frederick Goudy notes in his Typologia that “I firmly believe that the best types for our use must be newer letter forms based on the shapes fixed by tradition, fresh expressions into which new life and vigor have been infused, creating new types which are characterized by severe restraint and which exhibit the poise and reposeful quality that are always pleasing.” (42) The best sans serif typefaces honor such an observation.


Resources


Robert Bringhurst, The Elements of Typographic Style (Hartley & Marks, 1992 edition)

Alex Brown, “Type Renaissance: A Primer on Digital Type,” in Macworld, July 1991.

Frederick Goudy, Typologia: Studies in Type Design & Type Making With Comments on the Invention of Typography • The First Types Legibility and Fine Printing (Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press, 1977 edition)

Nicolete Gray, A History of Lettering: Creative Experiment and Letter Identity (Boston: David Godine Pub., 1986 USA Edition)

Steve Kennedy, “Facts-o-Type,” in Typeworld, September 15, 1991. 

https://www.myfonts.com


Successful Layout & Design

By Carl Shank April 7, 2026
The King James Bible (KJV), commissioned by King James 1 in 1604 and published in 1611, has been a profound Bible translation and masterpiece of beauty through the ages. It has been one of the most influential English translations of the Bible. Its history combines politics, religion, and literary achievement in early modern England. It has an elevated, poetic style that influenced many later writers. It has been prized for its literary beauty, historical continuity and memorability in public reading and worship (ChatGPT).
By Carl Shank April 6, 2026
Responding to AI and Digital Babylon H. Carl Shank April 4, 2026 Austin Gravley, a former Social Media Manager of The Gospel Coalition, and now the Director of Youth Ministry at Redeemer Christian Church in Amarillo, TX, is writing a book on AI and the digital revolution taking place. He compares this Digital Babylon and its captivity and its exiles to Christians living under the overwhelming influence of an active anti-Christian developing AI. Piecing together his comments with those of many others on the advancing scene of AI on our lives, several themes come to mind. First, AI is not God. While there are some in the Silicon Valley who might wish or see AI as a unifying, ontological force that can shape or rule our lives — the Super Machine —others remind us that this is only technology. And as advanced as AI is and becomes, God is still sovereignly in control of it and our lives. Jason Thacker, professor of philosophy and ethics at Southern Seminary and Boyce College, writes — “We must engage these issues, rather than respond after their effects are widely felt. But we don’t have to face today or tomorrow with fear. God is sovereign and his Word is sufficient for every good work, so we are able to walk with confidence as we apply his Word to these challenges with wisdom and guided by his Spirit.” ( The Age of AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity , Zondervan, 2020) A recent storm that darkened my community and scuttled Internet services reminded me of that. Even AI data centers, growing to over 3,000 in 2025 nationwide, are not immune to power disruptions and total blackouts. AI pundits may claim to have control procedures to keep the Internet and AI running cannot promise it to be so. We need to keep this in mind in the Digital Babylon age, as was needed to be kept in mind by Israel in the Babylonian Empire age in biblical times. Babylon went through many iterations, but will be defeated by God at the end of the day, as noted in Revelation. Digital Babylon will experience the same demise. This is not prediction, just Bible truth. We as believers need to hold on to such truth. Second, AI is still technology. Indeed, advanced and advancing technology, but not human. Matthew Schultz in a recent mereorthodoxy.com article notes— “Technology has existed since the Garden and is an integral component of our cultural mandate. We should also remember that one of the core distinctions between the Creator and his creatures is that we never create matter but merely (!) rearrange it. This becomes clear whether we consider an ancient farmer in Mesopotamia irrigating a plot of soil, a medieval peasant in Northumbria weaving a basket from flax, or a young musician in London taking the raw outputs of machine sound, adjusting its pitch, volume, and length, and incorporating it into a DAW loop. While there are all sorts of important distinctions and qualifications between pre- and post-industrial craft, there is no metaphysical distance between the two.” ( Artificial Intelligence Is A Technology , Feb. 26, 2026). AI may be the harbinger of a new Industrial Age, but though changes will be major and sometimes severe, the human side of the equation cannot be discounted or counted out. Part of my retired status as a pastor and theologian is that of a typographer restoring old type faces and doing a deep dive into the history of type. Two historical typographical truths stand out. Although the Renaissance age brought movable type from Gutenberg and others into the machine age, the typographical flair of those ancient scribes with pen-drawn exquisite type remained a stylistic standard. The second note is that with the Industrial Age, while affecting the quantity and speed of type development and printing, master type craftsmen rebelled against machine driven type for more organic typefaces. This was seen, for instance, in the type movement spawned by William Morris (1834–1896). William Morris was an Arts & Crafts designer who founded the Kelmscott Press (1891), reviving hand craftsmanship in printing. His work influenced the twentieth century private press and type revival movements. Lettering became a vehicle for breaking convention. Led by figures such as Morris, there was a decided reaction against industrialization, seeing machine-made goods as dehumanizing and ugly. Handcraftmanship, honesty in materials and utility fused with beauty made up much of what was called the Arts & Crafts Movement. That movement was rooted in medieval guild ideals and morality in design. (For an expanded history of type development, see “Advances in Typography: A Historical Sketch — Three Parts” in the blogs by CARE Typography, www.caretypography.com , Nov. 8, 2025, Nov. 18, 2025 and Nov. 20, 2025) Third, AI affects everyone everywhere. Austin Gravely, a former Social Media Manager of The Gospel Coalition, raises and answers the query — “’So what?’, you may think. ‘I’m not an Internet technician. I’m not a fan of AI. I’m not planning to change how I use the Internet. Why does any of this matter to me?’ To put it bluntly: you are naive if you think these disruptions won’t directly affect you, or indirectly affect you through the effect they will have on others. If the iPhone, social media, and AI have taught us anything, it is that you are impacted by these events regardless of whether you participate in them or not.” ( The State of the Internet: 2026 , mereorthodoxy.com, March 30, 2026) He goes on to say — “A changing Internet will change you. It will change you in ways you can see and in ways you can’t. It will change those you live with, work with, play with, build with, and fight with. It will change what is possible, probable, permissible, and prohibited in your life, your vocation, your church, your neighborhood, and any other physical space the Internet touches.” I recall my 99 year old mother who passed away a couple of years ago in a nursing facility. She was one of those survivors of the Great Depression and World War Two who dismissed the first moon landing and had her flat screen TV removed from her room for fear the government was watching. She lasted for nine years in the same private room in a modern nursing center. She was attended by doctors and nurses and staff who used AI on their computers and other care devices. She even had a modern digital phone removed from her room and refused to learn it. While she personally rebelled against her AI driven machine age, she could not escape those who used such technology for her care. We cannot isolate ourselves from AI and its advancing development, no matter how isolated we try to be. Fourth, AI can be either a blessing or a curse. Again, Matthew Schultz notes — “Our task is not to develop a unique theology of AI but to catechize our members into a people who can wield this technology without becoming captive to its internal logic. Like alcohol, artificial intelligence will become a test of character, a dangerous good that divides the foolish from the wise.” He says “Yet the greatest danger is both more pervasive and less obvious: AI is much more likely to be deployed as a multiplicative layer that allows ever more efficient micro-targeting of digital services and physical products by industries that already profit from compulsive behavior. The advent of hyper-personalized, real-time engagement strategies will require legislative safeguards, especially if AI leads to video advertisements generated in real time for an exhaustively mapped individual profile.” We must seek to “humanize” AI and employ it “humanly.” We must resist the phenomenological bent toward unbelief in AI development and pressures. We must once again learn to think critically and pervasively and biblically about AI. Our young people must be taught prescriptive critical thinking practices, rather than unwittingly and ignorantly giving in to what their phones and computers spit out. Church and ministry pastors must pastor rather than let AI bots plan, prepare and even give their sermons. We must learn to smartly negotiate with the “Magnificent Seven”— Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Nvidia and Tesla — rather than blindly following their lead. Convenience and speed must not be allowed to overtake and overcome careful, sustained and critical thinking and acting. “To give language to this change, we must take the best of Christian thinking regarding the social and political imaginary and apply it to the economic imaginary of life under the glowing shores of Digital Babylon, and that kind of work cannot be done with quick hot takes. It will take slow, deep, and thoughtful meditation to apply the riches of Christian thought to making sense of the companies that got us here and where they are taking us.” (Austin Gravley, The State of The Internet: 2026 ) I am both excited and wary of AI. I have learned to be much more cautious about social media and the videos and photos and information they give. Much of it has been and is being AI produced and tweaked. Spammers use AI technology to wrest thousands of dollars from unsuspecting senior citizens. Schools are requiring students to turn off their cell phones or “bag” them until after school hours because of the insidious nature of AI generated stuff. I value more and more of a face-to-face approach in teaching and learning and mentoring others. And we must adopt a state of “believing is seeing” rather than a non-Christian scientifically sanctioned “seeing is believing” approach to truth and justice.
Show More